الرئيسية | قسم التنزيل | أبحاث ومقالاتمواضيع مميزة  |  صور و وثائق | أشرطة سمعية مناظرات | مواضيع خفيفة |  قسم الفاروق

 

When did the Sunni Sects Exist?

horizontal rule

 

It is certain that there was nothing called "Sunni sects" in the lifetime of the Holy Prophet (s.w.), not even after his demise. The Sunni sects have emerged in the 3rd and 4th centuries (Hijri) as a result of political and dogmatic differences. Some of those sects have been abrogated and other were authorized.


We have here some questions in regard to this subject:


1- Why were some of those sects authorized and other were rejected? Are there any Quranic evidences and demonstrations, or prophetic traditions that urge us to follow, for example, the Hanafi or Maaliki sect? Weren't the founders of the rejected sects mujtahids? If so, hasn't any mujtahids the right to disclose his own opinion, like Abu Hanifa who practiced ijtihad - which he remained doing so till the end of his life?


2- Were the four famous sects existing in the time of the caliphs? Were the caliphs performing their duties and judging people according to their own opinions? We can notice the great difference between the Sunnis in the time of the Umayyad, Abbasid, and the Ottoman dynasties, and between the Sunnis in present time, especially in regard to issues
of fiqh and beliefs.


3- Can we trust those traditions fabricated by the oppressive Umayyad, Abbasid and Ottoman caliphs; traditions which were fabricated in their own benefit and to keep them in power - traditions which were consider to be the exact words of the Holy Prophet (s.w.)?


4- Can we regard all the savage behaviors of the partisans called "the Army of Sahabah" or the Wahhabites as Islamic propagation, and that they are guiding people to the true rules of Islam? Are the Sunnis propagating the true sunnah of the Holy Prophet (s.w.), or in fact, they are propagating the sunnah of the Umayyads and the Abbasids?


5- Were there any sects in the lifetime of the Holy Prophet (s.w.)? All historical records confirm that there were not any sects in that time. Moreover, the term "Sunni" had generated in the time of Mu`awiyah and later on.


6- Wasn't the belief of the determinists declaring that man must obey his ruler, no matter whether he (i.e. the ruler) was just or oppressor? Wasn't the opinion that "all the companions are just" derived from the false traditions which Mu`awiyah and the Umayyads had generated?


7- Is it correct to return to the old texts of a person who died centuries ago, to derive new issues?


8- Why do the Sunnis return to persons who died 13 centuries ago while they can consult contemporary scholars (faqihs) and eminent `ulama who have obtained high ranks not less than those who have pasted? Why isn't there any scholar (mujtahid) among the Sunnis who can save them from disputes and answer their religious questions of the day, while the Shi`ites have many scholars in every time and place?
Is the present knowledge and science the same as the knowledge and science of past times? Are the needs of our communities today the same as those which were existing 1,300 years ago?


9- Why don't the Sunnis follow the fatwa of the shaykh Mahmoud Shaltoot, the dean al-Azhar who considered Shi`ism as an authorized sect, as he says it depends on the intellectual and fiqh bases? Isn't that clear religious prejudice? Is not Shi`ism the right sect which is based on that which the Holy Prophet (s.w.) had recommended? Wasn't the famous tradition (i.e., "I am leaving with you two weighty things (Thaqalayn); if you adhered to them, you won't be misguided at all. They are the Book of Allah and my family") sufficient to follow the Shi`a sect? Have you any other evidences to prove the correctness of the famous four sects? Surely the answer will be "NO"! If you study the Shi`a books without
partisanship or prejudice, you will certainly not find any kind of contradictions and you will notice that they are not forging lies against anyone. However, we may find some Sunnis when they want to investigate other sects and their beliefs, they depend only on their own scholars' (sheikhs') speeches and opinions without paying any attention to the ideas of the `ulama of the other sects. Is it correct to follow such methodology to investigate another sects' teachings?